A book widely hailed as proposing a true mechanism for evolution actually reads more like an anti-creationist polemic.
We need to let Darwin speak for himself. It turns out that Darwin, given the opportunity, is quite capable of dismantling his own mythology.
For all practical purposes, there seems to be little daylight today between methodological and metaphysical naturalism, at least in graduate science classes.
Following up in considering Daniel Nicholson’s challenge to the machine concept of the cell, I will examine intracellular transport and cellular behavior.
At least as we’re accustomed to thinking in our age of AI, the alternative to a machine is a mind.